2013

 

Home

Go to 2013B, 2013A, 2012B, 2012A 2011B, 2011A , 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004

unmade films

 

JenaDesigns for Building Plans on CAD for  Planning Permission

Mrs. Monk's Would-be Diary should have been written by Mrs. Monk, since she is the "Writer" in the family.
However, since she is a writer only in the conceptual sense, I have undertaken to fill these pages on her behalf
If not by her, these pages will certainly be about her, and other important matters of the day         Leslie Monk

SITE STATS

 

 

  Complain, Applaud, or Comment  CONTACT Shoestringonline

 

by  Monkles 7 October 2013

twitter.com/#/monkfry

&

twitter.com/#/saramo

Feckless In Need

It is of course illegal to discriminate on the basis of age, but who could not notice the casual acceptance of age discrimination by politicians and employers and TV shows. 

On Question Time last week the panel speculated and compared very old pensioners with young adults, and about which demographic would be more deserving of favourable benefits, and which should give way in favour of the other. We were told that the UK cannot afford to support both.  The clear subtext that both are a drain on us all, and then the  politics, that one demographic should be pitted against the other?

State pension entitlement ought to be a clear contract and a right of entitlement for pensioners based on their lifetime of contributions, but it is however doled out as if it were a welfare cheque.

To reach retirement in 2013, and having made a lifetime of contributions, pensioners are expected to accept a devalued, pension because much of the contributions they have made have been lost, or written off in the banking crisis or so they would have us believe.

The cash still exists of course, but it has simply moved from one feckless bank who lost a bet or two with other feckless banks, who now have the pension funds under mattresses in Bermuda.

The feckless bankers were found short of competence in charge of pension contributions and had to be bailed out with public funds. Bankers in need, not only required bailing out, they also needed a little extra bonus to overcome their sad misfortune.

They don't call that a welfare benefit but it was signed off by our current government, so it is clear enough where their priorities lie.

So why would any pensioner  accept or tolerate politicians of any persuasion who allow themselves to make political calculations about the amount of income pensioners receive in the form of a state pension?

We know what happened to Robert Maxwell when he was found gambling with The Mirror pension funds, so what happens to George Osborne if found doing the same to state pensioners?

And beyond the bailout banker welfare beneficiaries, the untouchable Bermuda tax free Filthy Rich.

It is not true of course that we cannot afford to support both pensioners and young adults with a civilised standard of living. It is however true that the UK Gov. chooses not to afford both.

Go to 2013B, 2013A, 2012B, 2012A 2011B, 2011A , 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004

  Complain, Applaud, or Comment  CONTACT Shoestringonline

bankers were found short of competence in charge of pension contributions